The trial of former Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) commander Dominic Ongwen at the International Criminal Court (ICC) continues to spark mixed reactions in northern Uganda. Ongwen faces 70 charges, including war crimes, crimes against humanity, and sexual offenses, stemming from attacks on displaced persons’ camps between 2003 and 2004.
Supporters of the trial argue it is fair, citing the severity of the crimes, Ongwen’s refusal to take advantage of amnesty programs, and the opportunity for victims to see justice served. Many also highlight that the trial upholds international law and strengthens the rule of law in Uganda.
Conversely, critics view the trial as unjust, pointing to Ongwen’s abduction and indoctrination into the LRA as a child, and arguing that senior LRA leaders, including Joseph Kony, should face prosecution instead. Some former abductees and CSO representatives emphasize that Ongwen acted under coercion, raising questions about accountability and fairness.
The divide reflects the complex legacy of the conflict in northern Uganda, particularly the use of abducted children in the LRA, and underscores the enduring debate over justice, victimhood, and responsibility.
